Web Accessibility Testing with QF-Test
In this webinar, we will give a brief introduction to web accessibility and present the new accessibility testing features of QF-Test.
WCAG Compliance: Is your website accessible?
QF-Test comes with a dedicated test step for accessibility: the “Accessibility Checks” node. You add it to your test suite like any other step and specify which checks should run. A context-sensitive selection menu suggests suitable rules and parameters and inserts the correct syntax automatically.

You combine two approaches:
Because QF-Test simulates real user interactions, you can test not only static pages but every state of your application, for example after login or in an open dialog.
In this webinar, we will give a brief introduction to web accessibility and present the new accessibility testing features of QF-Test.
In this video we show you how you can use QF-Test 9 to test the accessibility of your website or web application. It’s quick and almost completely automatic! We will also demonstrate some of the other abilities QF-Test has gained with version 9.
QF-Test combines established accessibility checks with functional UI test automation. That’s what sets it apart from pure scanners.
Check dynamic states, too
Static scanners usually only see the page that loads when it is first opened. QF-Test clicks through your application the way real users do. This lets you specifically check areas behind a login, open dialogs and menus, filled-in forms with error messages, and dynamically loaded content.
Proven rules, no programming required
axe-core is widely regarded as one of the standards for automated accessibility testing. Among other things, the library checks for missing alternative text, insufficient color contrast, and faulty ARIA roles and attributes according to WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2, levels A and AA. You define which rules run and how strict the checks are in the “Accessibility Checks” node.
Additional checks beyond axe-core
QF-Test adds its own checks to axe-core: it checks the color contrast of icons and other graphical elements, uses simulated keyboard navigation to verify that the focus is always visible, and makes sure that the page declares the correct language for screen readers. You can deliberately hide known low-priority issues from the report. For special requirements, you can create your own accessibility tests.
One tool for functionality and accessibility
You simply build accessibility checks into your existing test cases. There’s no need for a separate test suite, and functional errors and accessibility barriers show up in the same test run.
Continuous testing in the CI/CD pipeline
If the checks run with every build, you detect new barriers immediately. This keeps regressions from ever reaching production.
Reports your team can work with
QF-Test categorizes errors and warnings, highlights affected elements in the screenshot, and provides hints on how to fix them. Your team can see at a glance what to tackle first.
With QF-Test, testers receive precise evaluations with hints on how to resolve the problems found. Our test reports in HTML format are flexible and interactive.
Scroll down in the sample report, enlarge screenshots and messages with one click, and use the arrow keys to navigate quickly between entries.
Automated tests find technical errors quickly, reliably, and reproducibly. However, they don’t cover all WCAG criteria. Whether content is understandable or whether operation with a screen reader really works is ultimately up to people to judge. QF-Test takes the recurring checks off your team’s hands, leaving more time for the manual tests that matter.
In an increasingly digital world, web accessibility ensures that digital content is accessible to everyone. In addition to fulfilling their social responsibility, companies benefit from a better user experience and a broader target audience.
Accessibility is also becoming increasingly relevant for compliance with legal regulations such as the EU Directive (EU) 2019/882, known as the European Accessibility Act (EAA), and its German implementation, the Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG), which have applied since June 28, 2025.
A central element of digital accessibility is support for assistive technologies such as screen readers, Braille displays, or voice control. These technologies enable people with disabilities to use web applications effectively. It is therefore essential that websites are compatible with these assistive technologies.
Accessibility is an essential part of modern software development and web applications. Software testers and developers are faced with the task of testing websites for accessibility. Manual tests are time-consuming, and much of the work is repetitive. Automated accessibility tests or A11y tests (a numeronym for “accessibility”) can save a massive amount of time by efficiently identifying common problems, even during the software development phase.
Ensuring accessibility begins as early as the design process. By considering accessibility aspects early on, developers and designers can ensure that digital products are designed inclusively right from the start. This includes the selection of suitable color schemes, the clear structuring of content, and the intuitive placement of buttons.
A central component of accessible web development is the clean and semantically correct structuring of the source code. This enables assistive technologies such as screen readers to correctly interpret and render the content of a website. Among other things, this includes the correct use of HTML elements and ARIA roles. QF-Test supports developers in checking the source code for accessibility issues by performing automated tests in accordance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2.
Whether you’re a public body or a company: almost all legal requirements for digital accessibility refer to the same technical basis, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) at level AA.
| Regulation | Applies to | Technical benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG (W3C) | International basis | – |
| EN 301 549 | Public bodies and companies in the EU | WCAG 2.1 AA, WCAG 2.2 AA in the future |
| EU Directive 2016/2102 / BITV 2.0 (Germany) | Public bodies | EN 301 549 |
| European Accessibility Act / BFSG (Germany) | Certain consumer products and services, since June 28, 2025 | EN 301 549 |
What does this mean for your tests? With QF-Test, you run automated checks against WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2, so you’re already prepared for the new version 4.1.1 of EN 301 549, which raises the requirements to WCAG 2.2. However, automated tests don’t cover all criteria. A complete conformance assessment also requires manual checks.
Is your website truly accessible to everyone? Our free accessibility check shows you exactly where your site stands — in as little as 2–5 business days. Including an interactive report with concrete recommendations.
No single procedure can fully test accessibility. Manual and automated tests have different strengths and complement each other.
| Manual tests | Automated tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths | Assess actual usability, for example with a screen reader or keyboard. Recognize whether content is understandable and logically structured. | Find technical errors such as missing alternative text, faulty ARIA roles, or insufficient contrast quickly and reproducibly. Check many pages and states in a short time. |
| Limitations | Time-consuming, require a lot of experience. Results can vary from tester to tester. | Cover only part of the WCAG criteria. Can’t judge whether content is understandable or meaningful. |
| Ideal for | Final assessment, complex interactions, testing with assistive technologies | Regular checks with every build, detecting regressions |
In manual tests, experienced testers check the software from the perspective of people with disabilities. Using screen readers, magnification software, or keyboard-only operation, they assess whether the application is not only technically but also practically usable. This is the only way to answer questions such as: Is the order of the content logical? Are instructions understandable? Does a complex dialog really work with a screen reader?
Automated tests take over the recurring technical checks. They deliver comparable results with every run and can be integrated into the CI/CD pipeline. This way, you notice immediately when a change introduces new barriers, long before they would show up in a manual audit.
The combination is the most efficient approach: automated tests continuously safeguard the technical basis and relieve your team of routine checks. The time saved goes into targeted manual tests where human judgment is needed. Especially in agile projects with short release cycles, this keeps accessibility at a good level over the long term.
Accessibility requirements are here to stay — and many websites still aren't compliant. To give you a clear picture, we now offer a free, no-obligation accessibility check: share your URL, our experts analyze with QF-Test your site against WCAG standards, and you'll receive an interactive report with concrete recommendations within 2–5 business days.
No risk, no hidden costs — just clarity on what needs to be done.
Can accessibility tests be integrated into CI/CD pipelines?
Yes. The checks run as part of your existing test runs, so you notice immediately when a change introduces new barriers.
Do I need programming skills for accessibility testing with QF-Test?
No. QF-Test is a low-code tool, and the procedures for accessibility testing are ready to use.
How can I find out if my website is accessible?
With the free accessibility check: submit your URL and receive the report within 2–5 business days.
With the free accessibility check: submit your URL and within 2–5 business days you’ll receive a report with concrete recommendations for your website. Our experts use QF-Test to analyze your website against WCAG criteria such as alternative text, color contrast, keyboard navigation, and ARIA roles.
Can accessibility be tested fully automatically?
No. Automated tests find technical errors quickly and reproducibly. Comprehensibility and logical structure still require manual review.
What does QF-Test check in accessibility tests?
QF-Test integrates the axe-core library without any programming effort. In addition, it provides its own checks, such as a color contrast check for graphical elements.
What is the difference between WCAG, BITV, BFSG, and EAA?
WCAG is the technical standard. EN 301 549 and BITV 2.0 translate it into European and German requirements. The EAA and BFSG define who is required to provide accessibility.
The WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) are the technical standard for accessible web content. EN 301 549 and the German BITV 2.0 translate it into European and German requirements, respectively.
The EAA (European Accessibility Act) and its German implementation, the BFSG (Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz), define who is required to provide accessibility – since June 2025, this includes many companies.
Which WCAG level does my website need to meet?
Usually level AA. This is the level referenced by EN 301 549 and the legal requirements.
Usually level AA. This is the level referenced by the European standard EN 301 549 and by legal requirements such as Germany’s BITV 2.0 and BFSG.
The requirements that apply in a specific case depend on factors such as industry, company size, and the type of digital service. Some areas may also be subject to different or additional rules. If in doubt, please seek legal advice on which requirements are binding for your service.
Note: This information is intended as general guidance and does not constitute legal advice.