QF‑Test vs. Cypress in Comparison

Cypress is a widely used, free UI test automation tool for websites. The Cypress approach is code-based and browser-based: Tests are developed, executed, analyzed and updated in the browser using JavaScript. Cypress shines with its seamless integration into the Chromium dev tools and the “UX time travel” feature, which allows to rewind and fast-forward through a test run recording like a video.

QF-Test offers broader deployment options, more stable testing over the long term and easier usability, making it an excellent choice for organizations that need a comprehensive testing strategy for web, mobile and desktop applications.

Cypress QF-Test
Setup and configuration
Easy setup for non-developers
License
Open source
Free ✅ (Commercial add-ons)
Supported Technologies
Web applications
Java applications
Windows applications
Android applications
iOS applications
Hybrid applications
Web APIs
PDF documents
Scripting languages
JavaScript
Groovy
Python
Target Group
Testers
Developers
Platform support
Cross-platform
Cross-browser
Supported browser drivers ✅ CDP ✅ CDP ✅ Webdriver ✅ Chrome native embedding (CEF)
Mobile browsers
Test Development
Structuring test suites, sets, and cases ❌ Flat code hierarchy ✅ Nested tree structure
Component identification ✅ CSS Selectors ✅ Component nodes ✅ SmartID ✅ CSS Selectors
Easy component maintenance ✅ Central maintenance
Integrated debugger
Test run log ✅ QF-Test run log, HTML Report, XML Report, JUnit Report
Multi-tab interface
Comprehensive Documentation
Advanced Features
Parallelisation ❌ (Cloud-only)
Headless testing
Accessibility testing
On-device testing ✅ Android (iOS coming soon)
Support and consulting
Professional support
Training and consulting
Free webinars

Which one fits to my team and our requirements best?

Why should I pay for a commercial tool instead of using a freeware tool?

The tool price is only a small part of the test project costs. The main part is the personnel costs, i.e. the effectiveness with which tests can be implemented and maintained is the most decisive factor. This is not taken into account in the pure tool price consideration. In addition, the test tool pays for itself after approximately 3 test cycles.

QF-Test in comparison

Compared to this competing products, QF-Test offers various advantages as a mature tool for test automation.

We use "Matomo" cookies to anonymously evaluate your visit to our website. For this we need your consent, which is valid for twelve months.

Cookie Configuration

Functional cookies

We use functional cookies to ensure the basic functionality of the website.

Performance and statistics cookies

We use Matomo for analyzing and optimizing our website. Cookies permit an anonymous collection of information that help us offering you a clear and user-friendly visit of our web pages.

Cookie details
Description Vendor Lifetime Type Purpose
_pk_id Matomo 13 Months HTTP Contains a unique, pseudonymized visitor ID internal to Matomo for recognizing returning visitors.
_pk_ref Matomo 6 Months HTTP Used to track from which website the anonymized user proceeded to our website.
_pk_ses Matomo 1 Day HTTP The Matomo session cookie is used to track the visitor's page requests during the session.
_pk_testcookie Matomo Session HTTP Used to check whether the visitor's browser supports cookies.
_pk_cvar Matomo 30 Minutes HTTP Temporarily store data about the visit.
_pk_hsr Matomo 30 Minutes HTTP Temporarily store data about the visit.